| 12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS. |
The fair
value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels, as follows:
|
· |
Level
1 Observable inputs unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities; |
|
· |
Level
2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable
for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data; and |
|
· |
Level
3 Unobservable inputs includes amounts derived from valuation models
where one or more significant inputs are unobservable. For fair value measurements using
significant unobservable inputs, a description of the inputs and the information used
to develop the inputs is required along with a reconciliation of Level 3 values from
the prior reporting period. |
The Company
recorded its warrants issued from 2011 through 2013 and its conversion features associated with its convertible notes at fair
value and designated them as Level 3 on their issuance date.
Warrants
Except for the warrants issued September 26, 2012, the warrants were valued using a Monte Carlo Binomial Lattice-Based
valuation methodology, adjusted for marketability restrictions. The warrants issued September 26, 2012, due to no anti-dilution
protection features, were valued using the Black-Scholes Valuation Model.
Significant
assumptions used and related fair values for the warrants as of December 31, 2013 were as follows:
| Original Issuance |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
Risk Free Interest
Rate |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Market Discount |
|
|
Warrants Outstanding |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
| 06/21/2013 |
|
$ |
7.59 |
|
|
|
52.4% |
|
|
|
0.13% |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
22.7% |
|
|
|
1,051,000 |
|
|
$ |
660,000 |
|
| 03/28/2013 |
|
$ |
7.59 |
|
|
|
52.4% |
|
|
|
0.13% |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
22.7% |
|
|
|
788,000 |
|
|
|
495,000 |
|
| 01/11/2013 |
|
$ |
6.32 |
|
|
|
63.3% |
|
|
|
1.27% |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
43.8% |
|
|
|
1,709,000 |
|
|
|
2,892,000 |
|
| 09/26/2012 |
|
$ |
8.85 |
|
|
|
58.5% |
|
|
|
0.38% |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
42.3% |
|
|
|
1,771,000 |
|
|
|
702,000 |
|
| 07/3/2012 |
|
$ |
6.09 |
|
|
|
61.2% |
|
|
|
1.27% |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
40.2% |
|
|
|
1,812,000 |
|
|
|
3,008,000 |
|
| 07/3/2012 |
|
$ |
5.47 |
|
|
|
52.8% |
|
|
|
0.01% |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
42.3% |
|
|
|
804,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
| 12/13/2011 |
|
$ |
8.43 |
|
|
|
60.4% |
|
|
|
0.78% |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
37.9% |
|
|
|
306,000 |
|
|
|
455,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,215,000 |
|
Significant
assumptions used and related fair values for the warrants as of December 31, 2012 were as follows:
| Original Issuance |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
Risk Free Interest
Rate |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Market Discount |
|
|
Warrants Outstanding |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
| 09/26/2012 |
|
$ |
8.85 |
|
|
|
70.2% |
|
|
|
0.36% |
|
|
|
2.74 |
|
|
|
53.9% |
|
|
|
1,833,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,112,000 |
|
| 07/3/2012 |
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
76.1% |
|
|
|
0.72% |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
55.5% |
|
|
|
1,867,000 |
|
|
|
2,756,000 |
|
| 07/3/2012 |
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
|
69.3% |
|
|
|
0.16% |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
55.5% |
|
|
|
930,000 |
|
|
|
509,000 |
|
| 12/13/2011 |
|
$ |
12.45 |
|
|
|
74.4% |
|
|
|
0.54% |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
52.3% |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
480,000 |
|
| 10/6/2010 |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
|
76.0% |
|
|
|
0.72% |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
46.4% |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,892,000 |
|
Convertible
Notes The conversion feature imbedded in the convertible notes was valued using a Monte Carlo Binomial Lattice-Based
valuation methodology, adjusted for marketability restrictions. The Company estimated the fair value of the conversion feature
until the retirement of the convertible notes in December 2013.
Other
Derivative Instruments The Companys other derivative instruments consist of commodity positions. The fair
value of the commodity positions are based on quoted prices on the commodity exchanges and are designated as Level 1.
The following table summarizes
fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
| |
|
Level
1 |
|
|
Level
2 |
|
|
Level
3 |
|
|
Total |
|
| Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commodity contracts(1) |
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
961 |
|
| Total
Assets |
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
961 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Warrants(2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
| Commodity contracts(3) |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
| Total
Liabilities |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
|
$ |
9,074 |
|
__________
(1) Included
in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included
in warrant liabilities at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets.
(3) Included
in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table summarizes
fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
| |
|
Level
1 |
|
|
Level
2 |
|
|
Level
3 |
|
|
Total |
|
| Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commodity contracts(1) |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
| Total
Assets |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Warrants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
| Commodity contracts(2) |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
| Total
Liabilities |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
5,059 |
|
__________
(1) Included
in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included
in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
For fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a description of the inputs and the information used to develop
the inputs is required along with a reconciliation of Level 3 values from the prior reporting period. The changes in the Companys
fair value of its Level 3 inputs were as follows (in thousands):
| |
|
Warrants |
|
|
Conversion
Features |
|
| Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| Issuance of warrants in July
offering |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Issuance of warrants in September
offering |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercises of warrants |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| Adjustments
to fair value for the period |
|
|
(1,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| Balance, December 31,
2012 |
|
$ |
4,892 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| Issuance of warrants in January
offering |
|
$ |
2,657 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
| Issuance of notes and warrants
in March offering |
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
| Issuance of notes in June
offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
| Conversions of notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,205 |
) |
| Exercises of warrants |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| Adjustments
to fair value for the period |
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
875 |
|
| Balance, December 31,
2013 |
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|