FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS. |
15.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS.
The
fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels, as follows:
|
● |
Level 1 –
Observable inputs – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
|
● |
Level 2 –
Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration
with market data; and |
|
● |
Level 3 –
Unobservable inputs – includes amounts derived from valuation models where one or more significant inputs are unobservable.
For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a description of the inputs and the information used to
develop the inputs is required along with a reconciliation of Level 3 values from the prior reporting period. |
Pooled
separate accounts – Pooled separate accounts invest primarily in domestic and international stocks, commercial paper
or single mutual funds. The net asset value is used as a practical expedient to determine fair value for these accounts. Each
pooled separate account provides for redemptions by the Retirement Plan at reported net asset values per share, with little to
no advance notice requirement, therefore these funds are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.
Warrants
– The Company’s warrants were valued using a Monte Carlo Binomial Lattice-Based valuation methodology, adjusted
for marketability restrictions. The Company recorded its warrants issued from 2011 through 2012 at fair value and designated them
as Level 3 on their issuance dates. All of such warrants were retired as of December 31, 2017.
Other
Derivative Instruments – The Company’s other derivative instruments consist of commodity positions. The fair
values of the commodity positions are based on quoted prices on the commodity exchanges and are designated as Level 1 inputs.
The
following table summarizes recurring fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2017 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
Plan |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Level
1 |
|
|
Level
2 |
|
|
Level
3 |
|
|
Allocation |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments(1) |
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
benefit plan assets(2) (pooled separate accounts): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
U.S. Equity(3) |
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Small/Mid
U.S. Equity(4) |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
International Equity(5) |
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Fixed
Income(6) |
|
|
5,664 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,664 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
$ |
14,956 |
|
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
13,958 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments(7) |
|
$ |
(2,307 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,307 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
The
following table summarizes recurring fair value measurements by level at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
Plan |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Level
1 |
|
|
Level
2 |
|
|
Level
3 |
|
|
Allocation |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments(1) |
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined
benefit plan assets(2) (pooled separate accounts): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
U.S. Equity(3) |
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Small/Mid
U.S. Equity(4) |
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,802 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
International Equity(5) |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Fixed
Income(6) |
|
|
5,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
$ |
13,401 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
12,423 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants(8) |
|
$ |
(651 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative
financial instruments(7) |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
(4,115 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,115 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Included in derivative assets in the consolidated
balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
See Note 9 for accounting discussion. |
|
(3) |
This category includes investments in funds
comprised of equity securities of large U.S. companies. The funds are valued using the net asset value method in which an
average of the market prices for the underlying investments is used to value the fund. |
|
(4) |
This category includes
investments in funds comprised of equity securities of small- and medium-sized U.S. companies. The funds are valued using
the net asset value method in which an average of the market prices for the underlying investments is used to value the fund. |
|
(5) |
This category includes
investments in funds comprised of equity securities of foreign companies including emerging markets. The funds are valued
using the net asset value method in which an average of the market prices for the underlying investments is used to value
the fund. |
|
(6) |
This category includes
investments in funds comprised of U.S. and foreign investment-grade fixed income securities, high-yield fixed income securities
that are rated below investment-grade, U.S. treasury securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other asset-backed securities.
The funds are valued using the net asset value method in which an average of the market prices for the underlying investments
is used to value the fund. |
|
(7) |
Included in derivative liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheets. |
|
(8) |
Included in warrant liabilities at fair value
in the consolidated balance sheets. |
Significant
assumptions used and related fair values for the warrants as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Original
Issuance |
|
Exercise
Price |
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
Risk
Free Interest Rate |
|
|
Term
(years) |
|
|
Market
Discount |
|
|
Warrants
Outstanding |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
07/3/2012 |
|
$ |
6.09 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
211,000 |
|
|
$ |
651,000 |
|
The
changes in the Company’s fair value of its Level 3 inputs with respect to its warrants were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Warrants |
|
Balance, December 31, 2014 |
|
$ |
1,986 |
|
Exercises of warrants |
|
|
(72 |
) |
Expiration of warrants |
|
|
(527 |
) |
Adjustments
to fair value for the period |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
Balance, December 31, 2015 |
|
$ |
273 |
|
Exercises of warrants |
|
|
(179 |
) |
Adjustments
to fair value for the period |
|
|
557 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2016 |
|
$ |
651 |
|
Exercises of warrants |
|
|
(178 |
) |
Adjustments
to fair value for the period |
|
|
(473 |
) |
Balance, December
31, 2017 |
|
$ |
— |
\ |
|