The fair value hierarchy
prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into three levels as follows:
|
· |
Level 1 Observable inputs unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
|
· |
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data; and |
|
· |
Level 3 Unobservable inputs includes amounts derived from valuation models where one or more significant inputs are unobservable. For fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a description of the inputs and the information used to develop the inputs is required along with a reconciliation of Level 3 values from the prior reporting period. |
The Company valued its warrants using a Monte
Carlo Binomial Lattice-Based valuation methodology, adjusted for marketability restrictions. Significant assumptions used in the
valuations for the dates noted are as follows (fair value in thousands):
As of September 30, 2012:
Original Issue Date |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
|
Risk Free Int Rate |
|
|
|
Term (yrs) |
|
|
|
Marketability Discount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
75.6% |
|
|
|
0.62% |
|
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
|
48.0% |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
December 2011 |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
|
77.7% |
|
|
|
0.47% |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
55.9% |
|
|
|
585 |
|
July 2012 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
76.8% |
|
|
|
0.62% |
|
|
|
4.76 |
|
|
|
57.5% |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
July 2012 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
73.9% |
|
|
|
0.17% |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
57.5% |
|
|
|
858 |
|
September 2012 |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
74.1% |
|
|
|
0.31% |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
58.5% |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2011:
Original Issue Date |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
|
Risk Free Int Rate |
|
|
|
Term (yrs) |
|
|
|
Marketability Discount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010 |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
68.0% |
|
|
|
1.09% |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
47.4% |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
December 2011 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
68.0% |
|
|
|
0.83% |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
52.0% |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
The changes in the fair value of the
Companys Level 3 inputs were as follows (in thousands):
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
Warrant exercises |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Adjustments to fair value for the period |
|
|
33 |
|
Balance, March 31, 2012 |
|
|
1,842 |
|
Adjustments to fair value for the period |
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
Balance, June 30, 2012 |
|
|
557 |
|
July Offering |
|
|
3,380 |
|
September Offering |
|
|
1,658 |
|
Adjustments to fair value for the period |
|
|
900 |
|
Balance, September 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
Other Derivative Instruments
The Companys other derivative instruments consist of commodity positions. The fair value of the commodity positions
are based on quoted prices on the commodity exchanges and are designated as Level 1.
The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level
at September 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts(1) |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
__________
(1) Included in other current
assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
Commodity contracts(1) |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,495 |
|
|
$ |
6,786 |
|
__________
(1) Included in accrued liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheets.
The following tables summarize fair value measurements by level
at December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts(1) |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
__________
(1) Included in other current assets in the
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
Commodity contracts(2) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,921 |
|
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
__________
(1) Included in other liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included in accrued
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
|